Today · Apr 5, 2026
JPMorgan Dumped 51,298 Shares of Choice Hotels. The Analyst Consensus Is Worse.

JPMorgan Dumped 51,298 Shares of Choice Hotels. The Analyst Consensus Is Worse.

A 12.7% stake reduction from one institutional investor is routine portfolio management. But when you pair it with a "Reduce" consensus, a CFO selling shares, and domestic RevPAR declining 2.2%, the picture sharpens fast.

JPMorgan Chase sold 51,298 shares of Choice Hotels International in Q3 2025, trimming its position 12.7% to 352,422 shares valued at $37.7 million. One institutional investor rebalancing a $1.59 trillion portfolio is noise. The signal is everything around it.

Analyst consensus on CHH sits at "Reduce" with an average target of $111.36. Two buys. Nine holds. Four sells. JPMorgan's own analyst upgraded the stock from "Underweight" to "Neutral" in December 2025 while cutting the price target to $95. That's not optimism. That's a reclassification from "actively dislike" to "tolerate." The March 2026 bump back to $102 still sits below the current $103.87 close. CFO Scott Oaksmith sold 600 shares on March 17 at roughly $100.07 per share. Insiders sell for many reasons. The timing alongside institutional trimming tells you something.

Q4 2025 earnings looked strong on the surface. Adjusted EPS of $1.60 beat the $1.54 forecast. Revenue hit $390 million against $348.19 million expected. Full-year adjusted EBITDA reached a record $625.6 million. But domestic RevPAR declined 2.2% in Q4 (adjusted for a hurricane benefit in the prior year), driven by softer government and international inbound demand. Record EBITDA at a franchisor while domestic unit economics weaken is a familiar structure. The franchisor collects fees on gross revenue. The owner absorbs the margin compression. Those two parties are not having the same quarter.

Choice's growth story is now overwhelmingly international and conversion-driven. Global openings grew 14% in 2025. International net rooms up 12.5%. The 2026 EPS guidance of $6.92 to $7.14 bakes in continued expansion. At $103.87, the stock trades at roughly 14.5x to 15x forward earnings. Not cheap for a franchisor with a domestic RevPAR headwind and a consensus rating that says "Reduce." Pipeline announcements are compelling narratives. Letters of intent are not contracts. I will never stop saying this.

The 52-week range of $84.04 to $136.45 tells you the market hasn't decided what Choice is worth. A $52 spread on a $100 stock is 50% variance. That's not a range. That's an argument. Institutional investors own 65.57% of float, and when the largest ones trim, the question for hotel owners and operators inside the Choice system isn't whether JPMorgan's portfolio managers know something. It's whether the fee structure and loyalty delivery justify what you're paying when the domestic demand environment softens. Record franchisor EBITDA and declining domestic RevPAR can coexist on the same earnings call. They cannot coexist indefinitely in the same owner's P&L.

Operator's Take

Here's what I'd be doing if I'm a Choice franchisee right now. Pull your loyalty contribution numbers for the last four quarters and compare them to what was projected when you signed. If there's a gap (and I've seen enough FDDs to suspect there is for a lot of owners), document it. Then run your total brand cost as a percentage of revenue... franchise fees, loyalty assessments, reservation fees, mandatory vendor costs, all of it. If you're north of 15% and your domestic RevPAR is tracking below last year, you need to know your actual return after fees before the next renewal conversation. The franchisor just posted record EBITDA. If you didn't post a record year, ask yourself who the fee structure is actually built for. That's not a rhetorical question. It's a spreadsheet exercise. Do it this week.

— Mike Storm, Founder & Editor
Read full analysis → ← Show less
Source: Google News: Choice Hotels
Citi Dumped 56% of Its RLJ Stake. The Real Number Is Worse Than the Headline.

Citi Dumped 56% of Its RLJ Stake. The Real Number Is Worse Than the Headline.

Citigroup slashed its RLJ Lodging Trust position to $2.05 million... a rounding error for a bank that size. The interesting part isn't why Citi sold. It's what RLJ's full-year numbers say about who's actually making money in this portfolio.

Citigroup cut 362,632 shares of RLJ Lodging Trust in Q3, a 56% reduction that left it holding $2.05 million in stock. That's 0.17% of a company with a $1.2 billion market cap. Let's be honest about scale: this is not Citi making a dramatic call on lodging REITs. This is Citi cleaning out a position that barely registered on its book.

The real number is RLJ's full-year 2025 net income to common shareholders: $3.4 million. Down from $42.9 million in 2024. That's a 92% decline. On a portfolio of premium-branded, focused-service hotels in major urban markets. Q4 comparable RevPAR fell 1.5% year-over-year to $136.79. The company beat adjusted FFO estimates ($0.32 vs. $0.28 expected), which tells you the Street's expectations were already low. Beating a low bar is not a thesis.

Let's decompose the owner's return here. RLJ carries $2.2 billion in debt at a weighted average rate of 4.6%. That's roughly $101 million in annual interest expense against $3.4 million in net income. The refinancing completed in February 2026 extended maturities through 2028, which removes near-term default risk but doesn't change the fundamental math: this portfolio is servicing debt, not generating equity returns. The 7.6% dividend yield at $7.87 per share looks attractive until you ask how long a company earning $3.4 million can sustain distributions that imply a significantly higher payout. Check again.

What's instructive is the divergence in institutional behavior. JPMorgan increased its position by 4.5% in the same quarter Citi was selling. Vanguard holds 13.5%. BlackRock holds 11.2%. Institutional ownership sits at 92.35%. These are not dumb holders. They see the 2026 guidance (0.5%-3% RevPAR growth, $1.21-$1.41 adjusted FFO per share) and they're making a bet that the cycle turns. Maybe it does. But 0.5% RevPAR growth on the low end, against expense inflation that RLJ itself called "choppy," means margin compression is the base case for owners. Revenue growth without margin improvement is a treadmill (I've audited this exact dynamic at three different REITs... the top line moves, the bottom line doesn't, and the management company still collects its fee).

Analysts have a consensus "Hold" with an $8.64 target. That's 16% upside from $7.43. In a sector trading near historic lows with 92% institutional ownership, the question isn't whether RLJ survives. It's whether the owner's actual return... after management fees, franchise fees, FF&E reserves, CapEx, and debt service... justifies holding the equity at these levels. The math works if you believe the cycle inflects in late 2026. If it doesn't, $3.4 million in net income on a $1.2 billion market cap is a 0.28% return on equity. That's not a lodging investment. That's a parking lot for capital waiting for something better.

Operator's Take

Here's what I'd tell you if you're an asset manager or owner looking at a lodging REIT position right now... or if you're a GM whose ownership group holds RLJ-type assets. The numbers at RLJ are telling the same story I'm hearing from operators everywhere: RevPAR is flat to slightly down, expenses are grinding higher, and the spread between top-line revenue and what actually flows to the owner is getting thinner every quarter. This is what I call the Flow-Through Truth Test... revenue growth only matters if enough of it reaches GOP and NOI. If your property is showing 1-2% RevPAR growth but your labor and insurance costs are up 4-5%, you're working harder to make less. Pull your trailing 12-month flow-through percentage this week. If it's declining, that conversation with your owner needs to happen now, not at the next quarterly review.

— Mike Storm, Founder & Editor
Read full analysis → ← Show less
Source: Google News: RLJ Lodging Trust
End of Stories